Quantitative Reasoning for Social Justice An Active Learning Workbook

The highest proportion of student loan debt (the amount of debt held per student) is held by students at for-profit colleges

²⁵

nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/25/opinion/sunday/student-debt-loan-default-college.html

, which are colleges that are not funded by taxes but instead depend on federal student aid (guaranteed by the government) and the tuition dollars that students pay to attend, often backed up by federal student aid. Contrast this situation with the vast majority of colleges and universities in the U.S., which are nonprofit institutions, which are usually run by a not-for-profit institution, religious organization, or government and hence often receive funding from taxes or a particular religious group.

The greatest proportion of defaults (see Definition 2.3.2) on student debt in \(2015\) occurred at the University of Phoenix, Walden University, Nova Southeastern University, Capella University, and Strayer University

²⁶

muse.jhu.edu/article/616850

, of which all but Nova are for-profit.

Almost all students are eligible to receive federal student loans, which are student loans funded by the U.S. federal government through programs such as Pell Grants. Federal loans are either subsidized (that is, interest payments are covered by the federal government for a period including the student’s time at a college or university

²⁷

studentaid.gov/understand-aid/types/loans/subsidized-unsubsidized

; such loans are restricted to undergraduates only) or unsubsidized (in which case borrowers must pay the interest).

In contrast, private student loans are loans offered by non-governmental companies which are heavily advertised, do not offer the relatively generous forbearance and deferred-payment options that federal loans do, and charge interest while the borrower is in college. Often, private student loan interest rates are higher even than those of unsubsidized federal student loans. Since many students do not have a credit history, federal student loans do not require proof of, or a co-signer attesting, “creditworthiness”, or evidence of past ability to repay debt; as of the \(2010\)s, most private student loans required such proof

²⁸

files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201207_cfpb_Reports_Private-Student-Loans.pdf

. Additionally, students who declare bankruptcy are unable to discharge private student loans, meaning borrowers who have no money are still required to pay private corporations back for student loans

²⁹

txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/CLE%20Discharge%20and%20Dischargeability%20%202019%20%20Podcast.pdf

. Therefore, the U.S. government earns more income from student loans, but profits less, on average, than private student loan companies.

Employers benefit from the number of students who attend college, including those who could not otherwise attend without taking out student loans. “Credentialism”, the continuing growth in employers’ expectations of postsecondary education on the part of their employees, has been called a key driver of student loan debt

³⁰

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23328584221093325

. In \(2020\text{,}\) earnings were stagnant for most workers, but declined rapidly for workers with no college education. This pressures people to seek a college education whether or not they can afford it.

Finally, a \(2022\) article in The Atlantic

³¹

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/should-biden-forgive-student-loan-debt/629700/&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

implies that middle-class college graduates were able to advance their cause over other causes championed by more marginalized groups because they have higher relative political power compared to non-college graduates. Certainly, as we will see in the next sections, middle-class college graduates benefit a great deal from President Biden’s \(2022\) student debt cancellation policy.